Filling your Tax Return in the UK: Allowable business expenses? Thread poster: Charlotte Boudon
|
Hi there, What do you guys claim as business expenses when doing your Tax Return? I'll be doing my 2nd one this year and it occurred to me that there might be things I didn't think about last year. Would the following be allowed? • Renewing my ProZ subscription (or any other similar site) • Upgrading to a newer version of Trados • Buying any Windows-related software when owning a Mac • Having to buy a new computer I'm ... See more Hi there, What do you guys claim as business expenses when doing your Tax Return? I'll be doing my 2nd one this year and it occurred to me that there might be things I didn't think about last year. Would the following be allowed? • Renewing my ProZ subscription (or any other similar site) • Upgrading to a newer version of Trados • Buying any Windows-related software when owning a Mac • Having to buy a new computer I'm really interested in this because I'm sure there are a lot of things I just wouldn't think about. Thanks in advance for any help you can give. ▲ Collapse | | | Library books | Jun 9, 2010 |
Several newspapers publish annual tax guides (Mail and Telegraph, at least) which have chapters on what can and can't be claimed by the self employed. They are a good starting point. There are also a couple of books in the "... for Dummies" series which are very useful. And at the risk of sounding patronising, from the questions you are asking, I recommend you start with the basic stuff first. The key words are "wholly and exclusively". There are also hmrc's websi... See more Several newspapers publish annual tax guides (Mail and Telegraph, at least) which have chapters on what can and can't be claimed by the self employed. They are a good starting point. There are also a couple of books in the "... for Dummies" series which are very useful. And at the risk of sounding patronising, from the questions you are asking, I recommend you start with the basic stuff first. The key words are "wholly and exclusively". There are also hmrc's website, various business advice sites, and indeed this forum's very own search function. Oh, and accountants, too, of course. ▲ Collapse | | | RE: Library books | Jun 9, 2010 |
I have looked at the HMRC website and searched this forum to some extent but a lot of it is going right over my head and I guess all I asked for was a few concrete examples. | | | Alex Eames Local time: 14:51 English to Polish + ... everything you can justify | Jun 9, 2010 |
Charlotte Boudon wrote: Hi there, What do you guys claim as business expenses when doing your Tax Return? Everything you can justify, should be claimed. Would the following be allowed? • Renewing my ProZ subscription (or any other similar site) • Upgrading to a newer version of Trados • Buying any Windows-related software when owning a Mac • Having to buy a new computer
All those things are allowable, but the new computer is a capital allowance rather than an expense. The way our accountant explained it to us a few years back was that if you can defend an expense, you should claim it. If you can see yourself as able to justify it to an inspector if you get investigated, then claim it. For example. Foreign language TV channels are easily justified as they enable you to stay linguistically and culturally fluent in your source or target language. I wrote a tranfree article about it a few years ago and there have been a few ProZ threads about it too. Hope this helps Alex Eames http://www.translatortips.com helping translators do better business | |
|
|
Re: everything you can justify | Jun 9, 2010 |
Thanks a lot, Alex, that makes more sense now. I'll try to do some more research about it. | | | Invest in an accountant | Jun 9, 2010 |
Charlotte Boudon wrote: Thanks a lot, Alex, that makes more sense now. I'll try to do some more research about it. Keep your own books and at the end of the year let an accountant do your tax returns. He/she will know exactly what you can claim and will usually save you money. His fees are also tax deductable. Wise investment. | | |
Charlotte Boudon wrote: I have looked at the HMRC website and searched this forum to some extent but a lot of it is going right over my head and I guess all I asked for was a few concrete examples. It can be a bit intimidating if you're not that way inclined. I would recommend you start with the general (i.e. get an understanding on the basic rules) and then move to the specific, rather than hoping to extrapolate the general on the basis of specific examples such as the questions you asked. While there are undoubtedly other and possibly better sources, IMHO the "... for Dummies" series covers the ground pretty well, as I recall. | | | Claimed - but will it be accepted?? :-) | Jun 9, 2010 |
Alex & Malgorzata Eames wrote: Everything you can justify, should be claimed. I would not disagree with that as a starting point, but I think it only fair to point out the situation is not as black & white as that, and just because you or I think it's justified doesn't mean the revenue will agree. There are some decisions here, for example, that make me frown. http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/bimmanual/BIM37900.htm Or for example here: http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/bimmanual/BIM35660.htm which I was pointed to by the IoL - this is a gem. I was (am) looking at the Univ of Westminsters MA in Legal Translation. Pay the 5 grand for the whole shebang in one pop to get the MA - not allowable. Do the modules individually (and not get the MA) -> viewed as CPD, and is allowable. The same person learning the same stuff at the same place for the same reason - viewed differently. Once you delve into it, I can kind of see hmrc's logic, but I have to say that if I hadn't known this, I'd've claimed for the 5 grand because it seems evidently justifiable, and then ended up rotting behind bars for tax evasion Truly, a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing | |
|
|
Rebekka Groß (X) Local time: 14:51 English to German Totally agree with Marijke | Jun 9, 2010 |
Marijke Singer wrote: Charlotte Boudon wrote: Thanks a lot, Alex, that makes more sense now. I'll try to do some more research about it. Keep your own books and at the end of the year let an accountant do your tax returns. He/she will know exactly what you can claim and will usually save you money. His fees are also tax deductable. Wise investment. | | | Alex Eames Local time: 14:51 English to Polish + ... I agree - use an accountant until you know the ropes | Jun 9, 2010 |
Accountants are useful if you can find one that isn't too scared to push right up to the line, and yet still charges reasonable fees. I agree Charlie that some things are "cut and dried" disallowable, and claiming for those would be foolish. But there's an awful lot of grey area out there and that's where the "justify it and claim it" territory lies. The trouble is that a lot of accountants can't even agree amongst themselves what is allowable and what isn't (remember t... See more Accountants are useful if you can find one that isn't too scared to push right up to the line, and yet still charges reasonable fees. I agree Charlie that some things are "cut and dried" disallowable, and claiming for those would be foolish. But there's an awful lot of grey area out there and that's where the "justify it and claim it" territory lies. The trouble is that a lot of accountants can't even agree amongst themselves what is allowable and what isn't (remember the recent EU VAT rules threads?). For example, what percentage of your motor car use is reasonable? Well it depends how much of it you use for business purposes. I tracked mine for a couple of years and it worked out consistently ~30%. As long as you can support it with evidence, you can claim a proportion of you motor use. Our accountant told us to claim for foreign language TV, all books and journals and magazine subscriptions of any kind etc. These are justifiable under keeping current. A couple of years worth of accountant's fees can be well worth it, but after that you may be confident enough to do your own - depending on circumstances. Alex Eames http://www.translatortips.com helping translators do better business ▲ Collapse | | | Peter Linton (X) Local time: 14:51 Swedish to English + ... My understanding | Jun 9, 2010 |
A couple of years ago I went to a talk by an HMRC official about tax for translators. As other people have mentioned here, there were three vital principles: -- You can charge for anything that enables you to run your business better -- But it must be wholly and exclusively -- You can claim training that updates your skills, but not for new skills. So I would regard these as claimable: Charlotte Boudon wrote: • Renewing my ProZ subscription (or any other similar site) • Upgrading to a newer version of Trados Borderline: (is it wholly and exclusively? • Buying any Windows-related software when owning a Mac
Capital expenditure, not a business expense: • Having to buy a new computer
Within those boundaries, there are lots of things you can claim: -- Dictionaries, essential software, newspapers etc -- Share of household expenses ( heating, lighting, council tax (though some accountants do not) -- Relevant training courses and conferences, including travel and subsistence here and abroad. They understand the need for language immersion. But combining a translation conference in the South of France with a holiday may raise queries. One interesting aspect: for environmental reasons, you can charge something like 20p a mile when using a bicycle on business. The third criterion above explains why you can charge for CPD, but not an MA. However, if you can prove that the MA was to update your knowledge rather than being new knowledge, you might be able to claim it. I did. A few years ago I did 2 Master's degrees in Translation one after the other and claimed for both. HMRC sent me a letter saying they would conduct an investigation. I was able to prove that many years ago I had worked as a translator and linguist, and the degrees were updates, not just new knowledge. This was accepted. | | | Re: My understanding | Jun 9, 2010 |
Thank you very much, Peter, I think I understand a lot better now. Regarding the Windows-related software, since I own a Mac computer the only reason I own and use Windows is because of Trados. Surely, that falls under "anything that enables you to run your business better", yes? | |
|
|
Alex Eames Local time: 14:51 English to Polish + ... Yes, without a doubt | Jun 10, 2010 |
Charlotte Boudon wrote: Thank you very much, Peter, I think I understand a lot better now. Yes. Very good info Peter. Charlotte Boudon wrote: Regarding the Windows-related software, since I own a Mac computer the only reason I own and use Windows is because of Trados. Surely, that falls under "anything that enables you to run your business better", yes? Yes. Absoluteley. Alex Eames http://www.translatortips.com helping translators do better business
[Edited at 2010-06-10 07:18 GMT] | | | Alex Eames Local time: 14:51 English to Polish + ... That's interesting - I wonder why? | Jun 10, 2010 |
Peter Linton wrote: -- You can claim training that updates your skills, but not for new skills. That's a nice grey area, open to justification - as your MA example proves. I wonder what the reasoning is behind not allowing tax deductions for training for acquiring new skills? Would it be that they don't want to foot the bill for a change of career direction or something else? Alex Eames http://www.translatortips.com helping translators do better business | | | A pedant writes.... | Jun 10, 2010 |
Alex & Malgorzata Eames wrote: Charlotte Boudon wrote: Regarding the Windows-related software, since I own a Mac computer the only reason I own and use Windows is because of Trados. Surely, that falls under "anything that enables you to run your business better", yes? Yes. Absoluteley. Indeedy. Do not forget the wholly and exclusively guideline, though. Work reasons may have been the sole and entire reason you now own Windows. To claim the cost in full, it must also be only used for business purposes subsequent to that decision. If you use Windows for non-work related purposes, then strictly speaking, you should only claim for a proportion of it. The tax books are full of examples of plumbers buying vans because they need one for work, and then using it for non-business reasons, and suchlike. Meanwhile, the more I think about it, while I understand the distinction in the MA/CPD situation, the less I agree with it. Even if a translator did decide to learn Lithuanian or specialise in Law or brain surgery, how is that essentially different from the investment allowances companies are allowed to use when they decide to diversify? OK, it is different because one is capital exenditure in tangibles and the other is intangible, I can see that, but nonetheless.... grrrr !! | | | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » Filling your Tax Return in the UK: Allowable business expenses? Wordfast Pro | Translation Memory Software for Any Platform
Exclusive discount for ProZ.com users!
Save over 13% when purchasing Wordfast Pro through ProZ.com. Wordfast is the world's #1 provider of platform-independent Translation Memory software. Consistently ranked the most user-friendly and highest value
Buy now! » |
| Protemos translation business management system | Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!
The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.
More info » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |