11:05 Jul 24, 2023 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Social Sciences - Other | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Sakshi Garg India Local time: 00:19 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | It can be interpreted as capacity to hold our experiences in mind without judgment, simply noticing |
| ||
4 +1 | in the unlikely event that we were born into... |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
@ haribert |
|
Discussion entries: 5 | |
---|---|
if we were born into such an open awareness It can be interpreted as capacity to hold our experiences in mind without judgment, simply noticing Explanation: Clinical scientists discovered meditation in the 1970s, and it’s now one of the most thoroughly researched of all psychotherapy methods. Over the past 15 years, research has focused primarily on mindfulness, or awareness of present experience, with acceptance. Mindfulness is considered an underlying factor in effective psychotherapy and emotional healing in general. When therapy goes well, patients (or clients) develop an accepting attitude toward whatever they’re experiencing in the therapy room—fear, anger, sadness, joy, relief, boredom, love—and this benevolent attitude gets transferred to daily life. A special bonus of mindfulness is that it can be practiced at home in the form of meditation. I would suggest you to read the book The Mindful Path to Self-Compassion: Freeing Yourself from Destructive Thoughts and Emotions, Christopher K. Germer This book discusses the importance of open awareness in cultivating self-compassion. The authors write that open awareness is the capacity to hold our experiences in mind without judgment, simply noticing them as they are. They suggest that we were born with this capacity, but that it can be obscured by our experiences in the world. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 19 mins (2023-07-24 11:25:14 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- https://www.guilford.com/excerpts/germer2_introduction_ch1.p... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 58 mins (2023-07-24 12:04:18 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- As a hypothetical, or conjunctive, if statement. The author is imagining a world where we are born with a natural capacity for open awareness. This would allow us to embrace the curiosity of identity and let go of expectation and embrace uncertainty. The author's use of the phrase we can nurture our fundamental capacity for open awareness suggests that they are using the if statement in the second way, as a statement of fact. However, the context of the passage also supports the interpretation of the if statement as a hypothetical. The author is discussing the challenges of maintaining an open awareness in a world that rewards certainty. They are imagining a world where we are born with a natural capacity for open awareness, and they are suggesting that this would make it easier to overcome these challenges. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2023-07-24 12:36:31 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- The author does say that we can recapture open awareness. This suggests that we are born with this capacity, but that it can be lost along the way. The author is suggesting that we can regain this capacity through practice and intention. The phrase if we were born into is a hypothetical statement, but it is also a reminder that open awareness is a natural state of being. We may have lost this capacity, but it is still within us. The phrase if we had maintained/kept this capacity is also a valid way to express this idea. It suggests that we had the capacity for open awareness at one point, but that we lost it through our actions or experiences. However, I think the phrase if we were born into is more poetic and evocative. It suggests that open awareness is a fundamental part of who we are, and that we can regain it by reconnecting with our true nature. |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
if we were born into such an open awareness in the unlikely event that we were born into... Explanation: "If we were born.." in grammatical terms is a simple 2nd conditional construction with Present Subjunctive and relates to something improbable Q. Were we born with this capacity? Or not? A. probably not. Q.Is it likely we were born with it? A. Unlikely In this case, it COULD be that the author is saying: In the unlikely event that we WERE BORN with this more fluid version of a narrative self, with open awareness/beginners' mind and subsequently lost it in childhood, we can recapture it later by nurturing "our fundamental capacity for open awareness;" Yes, he seems to think that some people manage to keep that "childlike, innate curiosity, kindness, and connection alive" through childhood and beyond. It's well known that toddlers already have a notion of self by the age of 2, that has been steadily developing since their birth. Many (Most) lose their sense of connection to the natural world as they grow older and become aware of expectations, of parents, family, teachers and society) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 days 1 hr (2023-07-26 12:34:37 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- So it may seem the author is contradicting himself but I think not. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 days 5 hrs (2023-07-26 17:02:27 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- no, it is not simple past with IF in front of it And no, he actually says even before our earliest school days [...] when we we are rewarded for the top-down certainty of our narrative self’s capacity to construct a noun-like identity." From the time we are born there is a push on to make us self aware, so "Open awareness" is not something that is sought after at all. Yes, he says "We can keep a childlike, innate curiosity, kindness, and connection alive as we develop past the early years of life" but that is not the same as the open awareness or lack of self awareness we are born with -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 days 5 hrs (2023-07-26 17:03:58 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- I really don't understand why you are ignoring the IF? -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 4 days (2023-07-28 14:49:54 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Haribert, I see why you want to ignore the "IF" and maybe it's a typo. This author definitely needs a better editor. In grammatical terms IF makes it a 2nd conditional= improbably/unlikely. Past Simple has also been acceptable for at least 30 years now "if I was you..." etc. Yes, it would make it more simple to say: We were (all) born with open awareness and [...] IF we (were to) lose it in childhood, we can (could) always recapture it. Is that what you think he wants to say? As I said earlier, it is widely accpted that self awareness only begins around the age of 18 months but, rightly or wrongly, it's something to be desired (rather than keeping or recapturing a childlike quality) |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
15 days |
Reference: @ haribert Reference information: Il problema io lo vedo piuttosto in quell' "into". Da come è costruita la frase a me sembra ovvio che l'autore voglia dire: "Se fossimo nati...". MA poi segue INTO, quindi "Se fossimo nati DENTRO una tale...", quando ha più senso "Se fossimo nati CON una tale...". |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.