12:41 Mar 15, 2017 |
Tłumaczenia polski – angielski [PRO] Law/Patents - Prawo: patenty, znaki towarowe, prawa autorskie / patenty | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Autor wybranej odpowiedzi: geopiet | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Zestawienie nadesłanych odpowiedzi | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | Reference cited |
| ||
2 | provides a defence / is a deterrent |
| ||
1 | (trademark) opposition |
|
Głosy w dyskusji: 1 | |
---|---|
(trademark) opposition Objaśnienie: The mechanism is known as the opposition proceeding and it takes place before the USPTO administrative tribunal, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board). The benefit of such a proceeding is to determine whether an applicant has the right to register, as against any third party, prior to the acquisition of registration rights. Furthermore, the Board is staffed with experts in the trademark field, all of whom have been examining attorneys, some with experience in private practice - http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/sct/en/comments/pdf/sct... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 50 mins (2017-03-15 13:31:44 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Podniesione zarzuty: naruszenie art. 8 ust. 1 lit. b) i art. 43 ust. 2 i 3 rozporządzenia (WE) nr 40/94 oraz zasady 19 ust. 3 rozporządzenia (WE) nr 2868/95 (1), ponieważ przeciwstawiony znak towarowy nie był używany w okresie 5 lat przed publikacją zgłoszonego znaku towarowego a w odniesieniu do przeciwstawianych znaków nie istnieje prawdopodobieństwo wprowadzenia w błąd. - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2... - page 2 (prawa kolumna) -- Pleas in law: Breach of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and Rule 19(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95, (1) since the opposition trade mark has not been used within the five years prior to publication of the trade mark applied for and there is no likelihood of confusion between the two opposing marks. - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2... - page 2 (right column) |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Reference cited Objaśnienie: eg. EP 1 643 174 B1: (56) References cited: US-A- 4 298 027 US-A- 4 915 134 US-A1- 2003 213 523 -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 godz. (2017-03-15 13:43:31 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Autokomentarz: Co nagle, to diable. Korekta: objection Źródła: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/cws/en/taskforce/citati... https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2202.html |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
provides a defence / is a deterrent Objaśnienie: Cost effective enforcement Registration of a trade mark lets third parties know the trade mark is taken; provides a defence to allegations of infringement; facilitates acquisition of registration overseas; can block registration of deceptively similar trade marks by others; becomes a deterrent to adoption of deceptively similar trade mark by others; and increases the prospects of successful resolution of domain name disputes. http://www.davies.com.au/ip-info-tools/trade-mark-basics |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.